| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 34.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 59% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| Motherboard | Asus P7H55-M PRO (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20110104 |
| Uptime | 0.2 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 20 '17 at 00:19 |
| Run Duration | 138 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 4% |
PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
78.6%
Very good
|
73% 122 Pts
|
47% 353 Pts
|
22% 353 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 680-$360
EVGA(3842 2682) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1552 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 378.78
|
34.6%
Below average
|
34% 44.3 fps
|
36% 45.6 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
59%
Above average
|
58% 261 MB/s
|
102% 39.6 MB/s
|
26% 46 MB/s
|
|
|
66.4%
Good
|
87% 116 MB/s
|
61% 0.69 MB/s
| |
|
|
52.8%
Above average
|
66% 87.5 MB/s
|
119% 1.09 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
|
48.3%
Average
|
47% 16.4 GB/s
|
34% 11.9 GB/s
|
75% 53.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P7H55-M PRO Builds (Compare 417 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P7H55-M PRO
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples | 76x |
| Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples | 69x |
| Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples | 58x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 28x |
| HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples | 24x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 18x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 53% - Above average | Total price: $326 |