Asrock X470 Gaming K4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive	105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X470 Gaming K4 (all builds)
Memory	12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180419
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 10 '20 at 21:05
Run Duration	157 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$189 142,983 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	88.7% Excellent	Memory 89.1 1-Core 120 2-Core 238 84% 149 Pts	4-Core 475 8-Core 712 74% 594 Pts	64-Core 977 60% 977 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 88.7% Great: 86%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$130 75,831 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 75GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 380 235 233 163 66 65 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 508 Write 488 Mixed 332 SusWrite 190 85% 380 MB/s	4K Read 38.6 4K Write 102 4K Mixed 52.7 180% 64.3 MB/s	DQ Read 387 DQ Write 361 DQ Mixed 346 268% 365 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 114%
Samsung 750 EVO 500GB 31,052 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 304GB free Firmware: MAT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 482 371 327 327 327 327 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	120% Outstanding	Read 501 Write 464 Mixed 352 SusWrite 360 94% 419 MB/s	4K Read 43.7 4K Write 104 4K Mixed 58 196% 68.6 MB/s	DQ Read 385 DQ Write 361 DQ Mixed 351 270% 366 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 120% Great: 123%
Samsung HE103UJ 1TB-$87 979 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 25GB free Firmware: 1AA01118 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 91 69 68 68 74 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	51.9% Above average	Read 102 Write 111 Mixed 60.8 SusWrite 78.8 65% 88.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.2 221% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 51.9% Great: 65%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB 64,410 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 75GB free Firmware: GG2OA7J0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 90 86 88 92 92 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	54.3% Above average	Read 100 Write 98 Mixed 38.5 SusWrite 89.2 59% 81.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.5 99% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 54.3% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$34 287,720 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	MC Read 43.9 MC Write 38.6 MC Mixed 34.5 111% 39 GB/s	SC Read 26.1 SC Write 40.2 SC Mixed 29.3 91% 31.9 GB/s	Latency 68.3 58% 68.3 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 109%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X470 Gaming K4 Builds (Compare 391 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 46%

Yacht

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 45%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asrock X470 Gaming K4

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	121x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $189Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	55x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	45x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	27x
RX 5700-XTAMD $250Bench 98%, 254,908 samples	23x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	22x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	16x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	14x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	13x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $34Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	25x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	16x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $417

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16