MSI A68HM-E33 V2 (MS-7721)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics45.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7721
MotherboardMSI A68HM-E33 V2 (MS-7721)  (all builds)
Memory6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20181101
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 10 '20 at 19:38
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7700K APU (2014 D.Ka)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
53% Above average
Memory 71.8
1-Core 62
2-Core 125
52% 86.3 Pts
4-Core 200
8-Core 197
27% 198 Pts
64-Core 195
12% 195 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 53%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Gigabyte(1458 4026) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
45.5% Average
Lighting 55.8
Reflection 55.8
Parallax 58.1
46% 56.6 fps
MRender 69
Gravity 49.8
Splatting 50.3
45% 56.4 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
173GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 100 134 97 87 89 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
33.9% Below average
Read 414
Write 194
Mixed 248
SusWrite 111
54% 242 MB/s
4K Read 14.7
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 7.8
35% 9.33 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 56%
WD WD2003FYPS-27W9B 2TB
600GB free
Firmware: 04.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 78 79 80 80 79 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
44.2% Average
Read 74
Write 74.3
Mixed 61.5
SusWrite 79.2
54% 72.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
190% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown N3D04H1600E-512N Kingston 99U5584-012.A00LF 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.7% Below average
MC Read 17
MC Write 8.9
MC Mixed 14.7
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 10.1
25% 8.77 GB/s
Latency 97.3
41% 97.3 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A68HM-E33 V2 (MS-7721) Builds (Compare 1,084 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI A68HM-E33 V2 (MS-7721)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $63
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback