Toshiba Qosmio G50

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Jet ski	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Toshiba Qosmio G50 (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory	1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	Χρώματα 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20081201
Uptime	2.9 Days
Run Date	Aug 10 '20 at 19:06
Run Duration	237 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	36%

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo P8600-$42 8,502 User benchmarks, average bench 37% uFC-PGA Socket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	39.9% Below average	Memory 69 1-Core 10.9 2-Core 67.4 33% 49.1 Pts	4-Core 66.8 8-Core 60.1 9% 63.5 Pts	64-Core 66.7 4% 66.7 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 39.9% Great: 42%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9700M GTS 174 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Toshiba(1179 0001) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01 Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	2.43% Terrible	Lighting 2.13 Reflection 6.42 Parallax 1.19 2% 3.25 fps	MRender 6.71 Gravity 2.47 Splatting 4.74 4% 4.64 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.43% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD WD10JPLX-00MBPT0 1TB 11,708 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 127GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.01H01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 88 105 109 111 102 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	63.7% Good	Read 119 Write 103 Mixed 23.2 SusWrite 103 63% 87.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 122% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 63.7% Great: 75%
HGST 4TB 287 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 16GB free, PID 1015 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 25 23 25 5.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	16% Very poor	Read 32.2 Write 26 Mixed 26.1 SusWrite 21.3 35% 26.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.6 95% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 16% Great: 50%
Seagate FreeAgent XTreme 1.5TB 121 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 25GB free, PID 3101 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 10 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	11.8% Very poor	Read 30.2 Write 25.7 Mixed 21.7 SusWrite 10.6 28% 22.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 1 91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11.8% Great: 20%
Samsung D3 Station 3TB 1,520 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 9GB free, PID 6124 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 10 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	18.3% Very poor	Read 28.9 Write 25.6 Mixed 25.2 SusWrite 10.7 30% 22.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 3.8 4K Mixed 0.6 152% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 18.3% Great: 79%
Samsung D3 Station 3TB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 79GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 10 10 11 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	17.6% Very poor	Read 19.7 Write 22.7 Mixed 19.2 SusWrite 10.5 24% 18 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 4 4K Mixed 0.4 152% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 17.6% Great: 74%
WD 325AS External 500GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 99GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 10 11 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	7.24% Terrible	Read 18.5 Write 25.7 Mixed 17.5 SusWrite 10.6 25% 18.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.5 42% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.24% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	17.6% Very poor	MC Read 5.9 MC Write 5.2 MC Mixed 5 15% 5.37 GB/s	SC Read 5.7 SC Write 5.1 SC Mixed 5.7 16% 5.5 GB/s	Latency 104 38% 104 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 17.6% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Qosmio G50 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 37%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Qosmio G50

CPU
Core2 Duo P8600Intel $42Bench 37%, 8,502 samples	1x
Core2 Duo T6400IntelBench 37%, 4 samples	1x
Core2 Duo T9550IntelBench 40%, 23 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce 9600M-GTNvidiaBench 2%, 3,959 samples	4x
GeForce 9700M GTSNvidiaBench 3%, 174 samples	1x

SSD
830 128GBSamsung $109Bench 63%, 37,250 samples	1x
M550 512GBCrucial $283Bench 92%, 5,683 samples	1x
TS256GSSD230S 256GBTranscendBench 89%, 3,887 samples	1x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	2x
3GBUnknownBench 14%, 81,553 samples	2x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $151

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16