Lenovo 81F9

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 16%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 12.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics3.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 81F9  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190612
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 10 '20 at 07:33
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A9-9425 APU (2016 M.SR)
Socket FS1r2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
12.6% Very poor
Memory 19.4
1-Core 36.8
2-Core 29.8
18% 28.7 Pts
4-Core 33
8-Core 41.6
5% 37.3 Pts
64-Core 39.1
2% 39.1 Pts
Poor: 9%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
Legend(17AA 380F) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 18.40.16
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
3.33% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 5.88
Parallax 5.31
3% 5.1 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 3.97
Splatting 4.7
3% 3.92 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.33%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
905GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LCM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 18 19 30 16 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
9.01% Terrible
Read 10.5
Write 14.9
Mixed 6.3
SusWrite 20.4
10% 13 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.1
44% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 9.01%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G3B1 8GB
1866, 1866 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
19.1% Very poor
MC Read 6.2
MC Write 7.1
MC Mixed 7.5
20% 6.93 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 6.2
15% 5.3 GB/s
Latency 325
12% 325 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81F9 Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81F9

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback