Asus PRIME H310M-E R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 139% UFO	Desktop 90% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 119% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	153% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus PRIME H310M-E R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	29.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190813
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 10 '20 at 00:04
Run Duration	119 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$96 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	93% Outstanding	Memory 92.6 1-Core 131 2-Core 258 90% 160 Pts	4-Core 503 8-Core 757 78% 630 Pts	64-Core 759 47% 759 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 93% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% MSI(1462 3711) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 451.67 Performing below potential (41^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	153% Outstanding	Lighting 207 Reflection 219 Parallax 236 168% 221 fps	MRender 283 Gravity 211 Splatting 133 163% 209 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 153% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 215GB free (System drive) Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 102 104 110 113 112 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	63.8% Good	Read 116 Write 117 Mixed 76.3 SusWrite 106 76% 104 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.1 223% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 63.8% Great: 109%
Seagate Portable 2TB 11,289 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1.5TB free Firmware: 9300 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 80.6 Write 114 Mixed 78.1 68% 90.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 139% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 19% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 2666 C19 2x16GB 2,627 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	94.6% Outstanding	MC Read 35.3 MC Write 36.5 MC Mixed 30 97% 33.9 GB/s	SC Read 19.3 SC Write 37 SC Mixed 27.7 80% 28 GB/s	Latency 62.9 64% 62.9 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 94.6% Great: 96%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME H310M-E R2.0 Builds (Compare 6,382 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H310M-E R2.0

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $96Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	1,638x
Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	999x
Core i7-9700FIntel $295Bench 92%, 54,980 samples	948x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	688x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	555x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	362x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	306x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	175x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	144x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	193x
PSD48G266681 2x8GBPatriotBench 79%, 6,425 samples	190x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	161x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Excellent

Total price: $353

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16