Dell Inspiron 5675

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics60.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive209% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemDell Inspiron 5675  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 07PR60
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateAug 09 '20 at 14:03
Run Duration204 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
77.4% Very good
Memory 75.1
1-Core 108
2-Core 214
74% 132 Pts
4-Core 427
8-Core 858
76% 642 Pts
64-Core 1,172
72% 1,172 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300
PNY(196E 1355) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.20
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
60.5% Good
Lighting 79
Reflection 74.5
Parallax 72.4
64% 75.3 fps
MRender 67.6
Gravity 74
Splatting 56.2
53% 65.9 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
194GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXZ74H0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 749 976 1097 1120 1121 1118 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
209% Outstanding
Read 1,282
Write 1135
Mixed 572
SusWrite 1,030
225% 1,005 MB/s
4K Read 48.1
4K Write 93.4
4K Mixed 57.9
196% 66.5 MB/s
DQ Read 801
DQ Write 714
DQ Mixed 749
564% 755 MB/s
Poor: 134%
This bench: 209%
Great: 292%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
622GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 112 113 118 115 114 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
85% Excellent
Read 183
Write 100
Mixed 72.2
SusWrite 113
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
133% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 85%
Great: 113%
WD easystore 2624 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 2624
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 98 98 100 99 100 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
65.1% Good
Read 126
Write 108
Mixed 81
SusWrite 98.8
137% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 8.1
4K Mixed 0.8
308% 3.4 MB/s
DQ Read 0.4
DQ Write 10.2
DQ Mixed 0.6
369% 3.73 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 66%
WD Elements 1.5TB
1TB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.9 9.7 9.8 9.8 9.8 9.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Read 37.5
Write 36.5
Mixed 30.3
SusWrite 9.8
37% 28.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
94% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 22%
FANTOM WD20EADS-11R6B1 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 1340
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.8 10 9.7 9.8 9.8 9.8 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Read 37.5
Write 36.5
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 9.8
36% 28 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
104% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 22%
WD My Book 1TB
302GB free, PID 1100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.9 9.8 9.8 9.8 9.8 9.8 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Read 36.5
Write 37
Mixed 29.3
SusWrite 9.8
37% 28.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
108% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 22%
FANTOM WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
446GB free, PID 1340
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.5 9.7 9.8 9.8 9.7 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Read 36
Write 36.7
Mixed 29
SusWrite 9.9
36% 27.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
94% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43BB2-CRC 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
86.2% Excellent
MC Read 33.5
MC Write 31.8
MC Mixed 28.8
90% 31.4 GB/s
SC Read 21.2
SC Write 31.2
SC Mixed 24.5
73% 25.6 GB/s
Latency 90.2
44% 90.2 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Inspiron 5675 Builds (Compare 831 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

System: Dell Inspiron 5675

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $195
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback