HP EliteBook 8570w

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive82.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP EliteBook 8570w  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 176B
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150407
Uptime18 Days
Run DateAug 09 '20 at 08:07
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3610QM-$300
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
65.2% Good
Memory 79.9
1-Core 84.8
2-Core 154
63% 106 Pts
4-Core 273
8-Core 420
43% 346 Pts
64-Core 419
26% 419 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K1000M
HP(103C 176B) 2GB
CLim: 850 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 426.50
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 3% Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 348 139 137 138 137 135 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Read 470
Write 449
Mixed 350
SusWrite 172
81% 360 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 55.6
4K Mixed 35.9
118% 39.9 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 362
272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 124%
Intel SSDMAEXC024G3H 24GB
22GB free
Firmware: 9CV10379
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 92 93 92 91 91 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
35.6% Below average
Read 139
Write 90.7
Mixed 104
SusWrite 91.7
24% 106 MB/s
4K Read 16.9
4K Write 27.6
4K Mixed 20
66% 21.5 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 58.2
DQ Mixed 77.8
60% 83.6 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905428-173.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
51.4% Above average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 16.3
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 16.1
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 80.7
50% 80.7 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 8570w Builds (Compare 903 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8570w

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback