Huananzhi X58-RX3.0

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	4.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	71.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Intel Thurley
Motherboard	Huananzhi X58-RX3.0 (all builds)
Memory	13.5 GB free of 16.0039 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180619
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 08 '20 at 08:54
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	VNM-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X5675 8,072 User benchmarks, average bench 75% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	72.4% Very good	Memory 84.8 1-Core 77.8 2-Core 166 65% 110 Pts	4-Core 324 8-Core 488 50% 406 Pts	64-Core 577 36% 577 Pts
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 72.4% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 85F7) 1GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 451.48 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	4.06% Terrible	Lighting 4.8 Reflection 4.42 Parallax 4.81 4% 4.68 fps	MRender 5.71 Gravity 3.83 Splatting 6.09 4% 5.21 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.06% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 112GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 247 241 247 248 246 246 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	71.8% Very good	Read 258 Write 247 Mixed 240 SusWrite 246 56% 248 MB/s	4K Read 29 4K Write 55.3 4K Mixed 36.8 120% 40.4 MB/s	DQ Read 205 DQ Write 193 DQ Mixed 199 149% 199 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 71.8% Great: 124%
Hitachi HTS547550A9E384 500GB-$60 23,997 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 81GB free Firmware: JE3OA50B SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 55 58 58 58 56 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	31.5% Below average	Read 52.8 Write 53 Mixed 36.5 SusWrite 56.7 37% 49.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.6 110% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 31.5% Great: 50%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M392B2G70BM0-YH9 Winbond W25X/Q32 52GB 1333, 33 MHz 16384, 36864 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	25.6% Poor	MC Read 8.3 MC Write 7.5 MC Mixed 7.4 22% 7.73 GB/s	SC Read 9.1 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 8 24% 8.47 GB/s	Latency 72 56% 72 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X58-RX3.0 Builds (Compare 123 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 16%

Surfboard

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 14%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Huananzhi X58-RX3.0

CPU
Xeon X5675IntelBench 75%, 8,072 samples	28x
Xeon X5650IntelBench 70%, 13,757 samples	18x
Xeon X5670IntelBench 73%, 9,061 samples	17x

GPU
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	17x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	13x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	8x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	5x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	5x
TB 240GB SSDAnacomdaBench 67%, 45 samples	5x

RAM
M393B1K70DH0-YH9 M393B1K70DH0-YH9 Winbond W25X/Q32 52GBSamsungBench 41%, 54 samples	11x
Winbond W25X/Q32 52GBUnknownBench 34%, 41 samples	5x
M393B1K70CH0-CH9 M393B1K70CH0-CH9 Winbond W25X/Q32 52GBSamsungBench 42%, 25 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 41% - Average

Total price: $130

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16