Asrock Z77 Extreme9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Extreme9  (all builds)
Memory14 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120713
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 07 '20 at 12:30
Run Duration105 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
76.9% Very good
Memory 84.3
1-Core 107
2-Core 216
77% 136 Pts
4-Core 378
8-Core 519
57% 449 Pts
64-Core 521
32% 521 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 430
Zotac(19DA 2199) 1GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
3.41% Terrible
Lighting 4.23
Reflection 5
Parallax 3.28
4% 4.17 fps
MRender 5.38
Gravity 4.27
Splatting 3.09
3% 4.24 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.41%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 240GB-$139
153GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 400i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 209 203 192 202 178 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
40.3% Average
Read 377
Write 261
Mixed 193
SusWrite 198
57% 257 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 26.5
34% 8.83 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
50.5% Above average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 15.5
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 17.7
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 72.9
55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 Extreme9 Builds (Compare 56 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme9

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $506
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback