TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus TUF B450-PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics83.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive252% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF B450-PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200714
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 06 '20 at 15:54
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 38%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$85
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
87.5% Excellent
Memory 81.5
1-Core 145
2-Core 277
91% 168 Pts
4-Core 502
8-Core 815
81% 659 Pts
64-Core 1,029
64% 1,029 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑
This bench: 87.5%
 Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Asus(1043 8598)
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Lighting 104
Reflection 114
Parallax 96.9
85% 105 fps
MRender 98.3
Gravity 97.6
Splatting 101
81% 99.1 fps
Poor: 71% ↑
This bench: 83.8%
 Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$59
119GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42B2S7JA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 414 236 237 237 237 237 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
252% Outstanding
Read 2758
Write 1,200
Mixed 1,283
SusWrite 266
302% 1,377 MB/s
4K Read 67.1
4K Write 188
4K Mixed 90.6
318% 115 MB/s
DQ Read 808
DQ Write 413
DQ Mixed 391
349% 537 MB/s
Poor: 139% ↑
This bench: 252%
 Great: 271%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
617GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 159 163 164 163 164 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
93% Outstanding
Read 162
Write 105
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 162
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
156% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑
This bench: 93%
 Great: 113%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
9GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 3.6 4.7 4.5 5 4.8 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Read 36.1
Write 3.2
Mixed 9.2
SusWrite 4.6
13% 13.3 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1.1
111% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑
This bench: 12.5%
 Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
87.2% Excellent
MC Read 35.3
MC Write 23.7
MC Mixed 34.4
89% 31.1 GB/s
SC Read 25.8
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 33.8
79% 27.8 GB/s
Latency 77.8
51% 77.8 ns
Poor: 66% ↑
This bench: 87.2%
 Great: 118%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical TUF B450-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 1,642 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450-PRO GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD  $85Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples486x
Ryzen 5 3600XAMD  $190Bench 84%, 294,959 samples161x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD  $190Bench 86%, 635,419 samples155x
GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia  $266Bench 100%, 447,556 samples93x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia  $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples89x
RX 580AMD  $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples88x
SSD
SA2000M8500G 500GBKingstonBench 197%, 87,883 samples47x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung  $69Bench 276%, 367,854 samples42x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $100Bench 310%, 455,997 samples36x
RAM
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples124x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples73x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples52x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $351
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback