Asrock Z77 Pro4-M

Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	19.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	50.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock Z77 Pro4-M (all builds)
Memory	13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130711
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 18 '17 at 12:41
Run Duration	156 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175 165,979 User benchmarks, average bench 72% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	85.3% Excellent	Memory 92.8 1-Core 112 2-Core 222 82% 142 Pts	4-Core 428 8-Core 561 63% 494 Pts	64-Core 563 35% 563 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 85.3% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188 42,397 User benchmarks, average bench 16% Gigabyte(1458 352B) 1GB CLim: 950 MHz, MLim: 1145 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 376.33 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	19.9% Very poor	Lighting 23.3 Reflection 27.4 Parallax 24.3 19% 25 fps	MRender 31.6 Gravity 23.9 Splatting 25.1 22% 26.9 fps
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 19.9% Great: 18%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 41GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 13537 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 497 (B1) Unknown 96 96 81 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 43 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 31 (F1) Unknown 99 99 38390009674	71.3% Very good	Read 382 Write 310 Mixed 173 64% 288 MB/s	4K Read 30.4 4K Write 35.5 4K Mixed 26.7 99% 30.8 MB/s	DQ Read 203 DQ Write 101 DQ Mixed 80.9 79% 128 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 71.3% Great: 124%
Samsung 830 128GB-$109 37,250 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 35GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXM03B1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 33402 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1889 (B1) Unknown 83 83 603 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 62 43 38 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 253 253 1 (EB) Unknown 99 99 646 (F1) Unknown 99 99 72495328441	50.8% Above average	Read 355 Write 211 Mixed 186 55% 250 MB/s	4K Read 13.7 4K Write 35.3 4K Mixed 14.9 58% 21.3 MB/s	DQ Read 204 DQ Write 63.4 DQ Mixed 46.8 57% 105 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 50.8% Great: 76%
WD WD25EZRS-00J99B0 2.5TB 850 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 515GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 2 (03) Spinup time 147 136 9616 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4357 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 52 52 35433 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2283 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 712 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 1 1 674707 (C2) HDA temperature 115 89 37 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 197 0	56.4% Above average	Read 104 Write 92.5 Mixed 5.12 48% 67.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.48 4K Write 1.54 4K Mixed 0.17 68% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 56.4% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB 12,350 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	59.8% Above average	MC Read 21.3 MC Write 20.7 MC Mixed 19 58% 20.3 GB/s	SC Read 18.3 SC Write 19.4 SC Mixed 20.3 55% 19.3 GB/s	Latency 62.5 64% 62.5 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 59.8% Great: 64%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z77 Pro4-M Builds (Compare 333 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 56%

Gunboat

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 43%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Pro4-M

CPU
Core i5-3570KIntel $50Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	89x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	76x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	58x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	25x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	24x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	21x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	25x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	17x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	15x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	10x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBG.SKILLBench 53%, 47,852 samples	8x
Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 54%, 12,350 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Above average

Total price: $428

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16