Lenovo 20F9001DUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.92% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive98.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20F9001DUS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20F9001DUS
Memory14.7 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160414
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateAug 06 '20 at 06:58
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6600U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
66.7% Good
Memory 84.7
1-Core 106
2-Core 199
75% 130 Pts
4-Core 283
8-Core 284
38% 283 Pts
64-Core 247
15% 247 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Legend(17AA 2233) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4590
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
5.92% Terrible
Lighting 6.13
Reflection 9.04
Parallax 6.28
5% 7.15 fps
MRender 7.52
Gravity 5.67
Splatting 13.4
8% 8.86 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.92%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsun MZNLN512HMJP-000 512GB
137GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAV2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 270 76 70 78 73 77 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
98.1% Outstanding
Read 413
Write 328
Mixed 305
SusWrite 107
64% 288 MB/s
4K Read 40.7
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 57.5
191% 67.6 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 58.5
122% 250 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 120%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT16G4SFD8213.C16FBD 20GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 16384 MB
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
55% Above average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 17.1
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 18.4
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 72.2
55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 55%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20F9001DUS Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20F9001DUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback