Asus Z97-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics37.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus Z97-K  (all builds)
Memory20.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140627
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 06 '20 at 05:13
Run Duration214 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690-$51
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Memory 93.2
1-Core 102
2-Core 235
81% 144 Pts
4-Core 410
8-Core 297
50% 353 Pts
64-Core 248
15% 248 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
37.9% Below average
Lighting 50
Reflection 46.7
Parallax 41.5
41% 46.1 fps
MRender 38.7
Gravity 43
Splatting 37.9
32% 39.8 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
351GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 508
Write 457
Mixed 431
104% 465 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 87.1
4K Mixed 53.4
168% 58.5 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 352
DQ Mixed 292
240% 342 MB/s
Poor: 78% Great: 125%
Liteonit LCT-128M3S 2.5 7mm 128GB
71GB free
Firmware: VQDC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 197 184 184 200 200 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Read 488
Write 198
Mixed 235
SusWrite 183
61% 276 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 81.7
4K Mixed 38.4
141% 50.8 MB/s
DQ Read 290
DQ Write 203
DQ Mixed 166
146% 220 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 82%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
242GB free
Firmware: CC4B
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 146
Write 110
Mixed 85.1
85% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 112%
WDC WD10 02FBYS-02A6B0 1TB
215GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,714
Write 15.8
Mixed 28.1
1,057% 1,586 MB/s
4K Read 609
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 2.3
2,376% 204 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 48%
WDC WD10 02FBYS-02A6B0 1TB
111GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 20 3.1 0.4 0.1 5.5 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
20.4% Poor
Read 71.3
Write 70.2
Mixed 59.3
SusWrite 11.5
68% 53.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
112% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 48%
WDC WD10 03FBYX-01Y7B1 1TB
931GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 120 131 133 133 132 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
53.6% Above average
Read 126
Write 131
Mixed 96.1
SusWrite 123
162% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
131% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 55%
WDC WD15 EARS-00Z5B1 1.5TB
135GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 1.7 0.5 0 0 0.8 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
20.8% Poor
Read 94.7
Write 82.5
Mixed 72
SusWrite 6
80% 63.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
85% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 3x8GB
3 of 4 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1632 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
58.8% Above average
MC Read 19.8
MC Write 21.6
MC Mixed 18.4
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 20.4
54% 19 GB/s
Latency 61.6
65% 61.6 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97-K Builds (Compare 3,088 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-K - $147

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $795
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback