Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics71.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive69.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory28.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200701
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 05 '20 at 19:09
Run Duration257 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$375
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
83% Excellent
Memory 82.4
1-Core 158
2-Core 315
99% 185 Pts
4-Core 449
8-Core 839
77% 644 Pts
64-Core 2,214
137% 2,214 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 83%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
71.5% Very good
Lighting 104
Reflection 115
Parallax 96.8
84% 105 fps
MRender 96.5
Gravity 97.5
Splatting 0.13
46% 64.7 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SATA M.2 500GB-$100
233GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41110WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 310 202 256 192 125 201 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
69.5% Good
Read 473
Write 428
Mixed 262
SusWrite 214
77% 344 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 40.7
4K Mixed 26.6
91% 30.3 MB/s
DQ Read 225
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 176
140% 197 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 103%
Crucial BX100 120GB-$70
31GB free
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 179 180 172 126 179 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
76.8% Very good
Read 504
Write 180
Mixed 243
SusWrite 169
60% 274 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 68.1
4K Mixed 34.4
121% 43.1 MB/s
DQ Read 225
DQ Write 175
DQ Mixed 148
125% 183 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 89%
Toshiba THNSN5512GPU7 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
206GB free
Firmware: 410557LA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1522 1469 1361 852 903 1526 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
244% Outstanding
Read 1,562
Write 954
Mixed 881
SusWrite 1,272
261% 1,167 MB/s
4K Read 44
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 54.3
209% 78.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,003
DQ Write 808
DQ Mixed 719
589% 844 MB/s
Poor: 90%
This bench: 244%
Great: 235%
Toshiba THNSN5512GPU7 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
431GB free
Firmware: 410557LA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1441 1544 1550 1536 1566 1567 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
253% Outstanding
Read 1,353
Write 1,133
Mixed 1,001
SusWrite 1,534
283% 1,255 MB/s
4K Read 43.5
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 61
210% 76.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,004
DQ Write 798
DQ Mixed 694
576% 832 MB/s
Poor: 90%
This bench: 253%
Great: 235%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB-$14
213GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 92 90 92 92 92 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 93.6
Write 95.9
Mixed 54.4
SusWrite 91.6
62% 83.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 54%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
737GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 175 175 172 175 174 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
96.8% Outstanding
Read 164
Write 164
Mixed 40.8
SusWrite 174
98% 136 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
151% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 96.8%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
114% Outstanding
MC Read 44.8
MC Write 40.7
MC Mixed 42.2
122% 42.6 GB/s
SC Read 25.9
SC Write 24
SC Mixed 37.5
83% 29.1 GB/s
Latency 76.2
52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 114%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,050 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,005
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback