Asus H81M-P

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics7.47% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus H81M-P  (all builds)
Memory2.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150604
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 05 '20 at 17:05
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4160-$79
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Memory 92.6
1-Core 105
2-Core 191
76% 130 Pts
4-Core 279
8-Core 284
38% 281 Pts
64-Core 283
18% 283 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4730
PwrHis(1787 3000) 512MB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 8.970.100.7000
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
7.47% Terrible
Lighting 9.33
Reflection 9.19
Parallax 7.66
8% 8.73 fps
MRender 7.24
Gravity 7.17
Splatting 11
7% 8.47 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.47%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS721616PLA380 165GB-$46
106GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P22O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 50 62 62 55 55 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
37.7% Below average
Read 74
Write 56.8
Mixed 43.8
SusWrite 57.1
43% 57.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 39%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$25
420GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 99 108 108 103 99 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
60.5% Good
Read 107
Write 108
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 104
71% 96.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
187% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingmax FLFF65F-C8KL9 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
30.2% Below average
MC Read 9.6
MC Write 9.8
MC Mixed 8.4
26% 9.27 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 9.6
27% 9.5 GB/s
Latency 63
64% 63 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-P Builds (Compare 352 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H81M-P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $421
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback