Asus M4A87TD EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics32.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M4A87TD EVO  (all builds)
Memory13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110308
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateMar 18 '17 at 03:58
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T-$240
AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
61% Good
Memory 87.5
1-Core 53
2-Core 102
53% 80.9 Pts
4-Core 189
8-Core 284
29% 236 Pts
64-Core 280
17% 280 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 61%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
CLim: 1020 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.2.1
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32.2% Below average
Lighting 41.9
Reflection 28
Parallax 56.8
34% 42.3 fps
MRender 27.5
Gravity 41.2
Splatting 34.7
28% 34.5 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 320 Series 160GB-$149
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4PC10362 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
35.1% Below average
Read 207
Write 159
Mixed 153
38% 173 MB/s
4K Read 14.5
4K Write 29.8
4K Mixed 11.5
52% 18.6 MB/s
DQ Read 19.8
DQ Write 41.6
DQ Mixed 11.1
14% 24.2 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 51%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$30
423GB free
Firmware: JC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
65.4% Good
Read 112
Write 116
Mixed 83.3
77% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.57
4K Write 1.85
4K Mixed 0.47
110% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 70%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$21
119GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
43.7% Average
Read 77.6
Write 74.5
Mixed 73.6
57% 75.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.82
4K Mixed 0.25
74% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-012.A00LF OCZ3G1333LV4G OCZ3G1333LV4G OCZ3G1333LV4G 16GB
667, 667, 667, 667 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.1% Below average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 12.5
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 9.6
22% 7.57 GB/s
Latency 70
57% 70 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4A87TD EVO Builds (Compare 136 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M4A87TD EVO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $241
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback