Acer Aspire M3970

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics48.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire M3970  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire M3970
Memory13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111031
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 05 '20 at 09:58
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$184
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Memory 91.1
1-Core 86
2-Core 189
71% 122 Pts
4-Core 330
8-Core 462
50% 396 Pts
64-Core 463
29% 463 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
HP(103C 841F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1266 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.5% Average
Lighting 59.4
Reflection 64.3
Parallax 79.4
48% 67.7 fps
MRender 65.7
Gravity 62.4
Splatting 52.9
49% 60.3 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 143 146 150 152 148 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Read 163
Write 166
Mixed 72.3
SusWrite 146
100% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
131% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 96%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 16GB
5GB free, PID a782
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.4 8.3 8.6 8.7 8.7 8.4 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
5.78% Terrible
Read 17
Write 7.7
Mixed 7
SusWrite 8.5
12% 10.1 MB/s
4K Read 6.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
23% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.78%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
50.1% Above average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 15.9
48% 17 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 15.4
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 65.6
61% 65.6 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire M3970 Builds (Compare 451 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire M3970

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $222
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback