Acer Aspire V5-552G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.83% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive68.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire V5-552G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Dazzle_RL
Memory9.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131223
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 05 '20 at 05:00
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5757M APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
45.8% Average
Memory 67.3
1-Core 62.4
2-Core 85.9
46% 71.9 Pts
4-Core 144
8-Core 138
19% 140 Pts
64-Core 145
9% 145 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8650G
Acer(1025 080F) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
6.83% Terrible
Lighting 8.47
Reflection 9.23
Parallax 11.8
7% 9.83 fps
MRender 7.76
Gravity 7.67
Splatting 8.83
7% 8.08 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.83%
Great: 19%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 275 292 300 294 290 292 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
68.1% Good
Read 380
Write 303
Mixed 316
SusWrite 290
72% 323 MB/s
4K Read 12.1
4K Write 62.5
4K Mixed 24.3
83% 33 MB/s
DQ Read 229
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 198
152% 208 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston Elpida FCJ41UG6BBU0-DJ-F 12GB
800, 800 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
23.5% Poor
MC Read 10.4
MC Write 4.7
MC Mixed 7.4
21% 7.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 9
23% 7.97 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire V5-552G Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire V5-552G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 25% - Poor Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback