Acer Aspire R5-471T

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.72% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive57.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire R5-471T  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Luffy
Memory0.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150911
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateAug 04 '20 at 20:29
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 45%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
50.5% Above average
Memory 69.3
1-Core 70.2
2-Core 122
53% 87.2 Pts
4-Core 186
8-Core 183
25% 184 Pts
64-Core 185
12% 185 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Acer(1025 105A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4444
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
5.72% Terrible
Lighting 6.27
Reflection 8.73
Parallax 5.69
5% 6.89 fps
MRender 5.29
Gravity 5.4
Splatting 12.7
7% 7.81 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.72%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CV1-8B256 256GB
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: G881201
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 200 183 180 177 204 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Read 385
Write 304
Mixed 138
SusWrite 192
57% 255 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 16.2
4K Mixed 20.5
61% 18 MB/s
DQ Read 257
DQ Write 242
DQ Mixed 190
159% 229 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM LPDDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.6% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 14.7
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 14
SC Mixed 2.7
25% 8.8 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire R5-471T Builds (Compare 88 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire R5-471T

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback