Asrock 960GC-GS FX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive27.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (87%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock 960GC-GS FX  (all builds)
Memory0.8 GB free of 4 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20131002
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateAug 04 '20 at 17:41
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 87%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4800+-$150
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
20.3% Poor
Memory 33.9
1-Core 31.7
2-Core 43.2
23% 36.3 Pts
4-Core 42.2
8-Core 35.2
5% 38.7 Pts
64-Core 59.1
4% 59.1 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 20.3%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3400
Sapphire(174B E670) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.1100
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
0.66% Terrible
Lighting 0.77
Reflection 1.58
Parallax 0.44
1% 0.93 fps
MRender 0.9
Gravity 0.33
Splatting 1.3
1% 0.85 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.66%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX200 240GB-$36
102GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 95 78 42 39 23 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.9% Poor
Read 91.8
Write 114
Mixed 63.4
SusWrite 63.5
19% 83.3 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 31.5
4K Mixed 22.5
50% 19 MB/s
DQ Read 85.6
DQ Write 73.1
DQ Mixed 66.3
53% 75 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 91%
Seagate ST3250310AS 250GB-$44
48GB free
Firmware: 3.AAB
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 74 84 82 72 86 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
34.2% Below average
Read 41.3
Write 22.5
Mixed 15.5
SusWrite 77.9
28% 39.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
106% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 54%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
116GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 46 50 55 68 75 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
36.2% Below average
Read 69.5
Write 70.8
Mixed 26.3
SusWrite 56.8
41% 55.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
89% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4GB
52217, 52217 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
10.4% Very poor
MC Read 3.1
MC Write 4.8
MC Mixed 3.6
11% 3.83 GB/s
SC Read 0.3
SC Write 1.8
SC Mixed 0.8
3% 0.97 GB/s
Latency 233
17% 233 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 960GC-GS FX Builds (Compare 130 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock 960GC-GS FX - $122

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $197
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback