HP Compaq Pro 6305 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP Compaq Pro 6305 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1850
Memory1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161024
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 04 '20 at 17:22
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-5500B APU
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Memory 80.6
1-Core 65
2-Core 116
55% 87.3 Pts
4-Core 190
8-Core 190
26% 190 Pts
64-Core 191
12% 191 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7560D
HP(103C 1850) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1101.1001
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
4.45% Terrible
Lighting 5.3
Reflection 7.69
Parallax 5.12
4% 6.04 fps
MRender 4.86
Gravity 4
Splatting 7.61
5% 5.49 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.45%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 60GB-$76
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 505ABBF1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 74 74 76 73 76 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
50.3% Above average
Read 319
Write 77.4
Mixed 127
SusWrite 74.4
33% 149 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 50.1
4K Mixed 27.1
93% 32.7 MB/s
DQ Read 106
DQ Write 79.7
DQ Mixed 79.3
63% 88.2 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 69%
SMI USB disk 8GB
4GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.9 5.8 5.4 5.4 5.9 5.8 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
5.58% Terrible
Read 23.1
Write 5.3
Mixed 12.1
SusWrite 5.7
13% 11.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
16% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.58%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
K H 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
31.8% Below average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 10.2
30% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 9.6
24% 8.43 GB/s
Latency 79.5
50% 79.5 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Pro 6305 SFF Builds (Compare 484 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Pro 6305 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback