Medion P7652 MD61200

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics24.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive77.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 90% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemMedion P7652 MD61200  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION D17KRR
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181218
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateAug 04 '20 at 16:41
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%
CPU Throttled 90%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8550U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
67.6% Good
Memory 80.8
1-Core 124
2-Core 194
77% 133 Pts
4-Core 296
8-Core 417
45% 356 Pts
64-Core 381
24% 381 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile)
Device(1B0A 2303) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5167
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
24.8% Poor
Lighting 31.8
Reflection 23.7
Parallax 31.5
26% 29 fps
MRender 34.2
Gravity 30.3
Splatting 21.7
23% 28.7 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GB
157GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 30000P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 241 249 251 253 253 249 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
77.9% Very good
Read 403
Write 249
Mixed 191
SusWrite 249
61% 273 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 74.1
4K Mixed 21.2
112% 41.7 MB/s
DQ Read 366
DQ Write 250
DQ Mixed 181
169% 265 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 83%
Seagate ST2000LM015-2E8174 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 128 126 127 126 125 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 110
Write 122
Mixed 55.5
SusWrite 126
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
194% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD M471A1K43CB1-CRC 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
76.7% Very good
MC Read 29.3
MC Write 29.8
MC Mixed 22.6
78% 27.2 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 24.3
69% 24.3 GB/s
Latency 79
51% 79 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P7652 MD61200 Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Medion P7652 MD61200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback