ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asrock E3C204-4L

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	64.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock E3C204-4L (all builds)
Memory	28.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131112
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 04 '20 at 05:05
Run Duration	158 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1270 V2 3,610 User benchmarks, average bench 73% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	72.3% Very good	Memory 81.2 1-Core 104 2-Core 191 72% 126 Pts	4-Core 342 8-Core 515 53% 429 Pts	64-Core 518 32% 518 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 72.3% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% PNY(196E 118B) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.71% Terrible	Lighting 4.37 Reflection 4.31 Parallax 4.19 4% 4.29 fps	MRender 4.1 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 6.13 4% 4.71 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.71% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175 73,119 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 152GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM05B0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 225 241 238 240 239 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	64.2% Good	Read 255 Write 237 Mixed 216 SusWrite 234 53% 236 MB/s	4K Read 25.5 4K Write 42.6 4K Mixed 29.9 100% 32.7 MB/s	DQ Read 202 DQ Write 187 DQ Mixed 136 118% 175 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 64.2% Great: 116%
Intel 330 Series 180GB 5,848 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 113GB free Firmware: 300i SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 146 119 144 134 139 MB/s Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	54.6% Above average	Read 234 Write 172 Mixed 182 SusWrite 141 41% 182 MB/s	4K Read 24.5 4K Write 42.9 4K Mixed 26.2 93% 31.2 MB/s	DQ Read 182 DQ Write 168 DQ Mixed 169 128% 173 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 83%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32 107,978 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 264GB free Firmware: JC49 SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 75 75 75 75 75 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	58.5% Above average	Read 128 Write 129 Mixed 70.1 SusWrite 75.1 74% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1.1 190% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 58.5% Great: 70%
WD WDS250G2B0A-00SM50 2TB 794GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 149 148 148 149 149 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 146 Write 136 Mixed 67.9 SusWrite 148 91% 124 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.1 208% 1.53 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 18KSF1G72AZ-1G6E1 18KSF1G72AZ-1G6P1 18KSF1G72AZ-1G6E1 18KSF1G72AZ-1G6P1 32GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	55.6% Above average	MC Read 20.8 MC Write 19.8 MC Mixed 17.2 55% 19.3 GB/s	SC Read 16.3 SC Write 17.9 SC Mixed 18.1 50% 17.4 GB/s	Latency 78.3 51% 78.3 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 55.6% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback