MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive238% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200711
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateAug 04 '20 at 04:24
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$375
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
97.7% Outstanding
Memory 84.8
1-Core 152
2-Core 298
97% 178 Pts
4-Core 592
8-Core 1,108
102% 850 Pts
64-Core 2,114
131% 2,114 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 97.7%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP EX900 1TB
555GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0614B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1533 1563 1545 931 889 874 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
238% Outstanding
Read 1,454
Write 122
Mixed 715
SusWrite 1,223
195% 879 MB/s
4K Read 47.4
4K Write 179
4K Mixed 39.5
217% 88.5 MB/s
DQ Read 896
DQ Write 990
DQ Mixed 591
542% 826 MB/s
Poor: 113%
This bench: 238%
Great: 259%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
568GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 162 164 166 165 166 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
93.7% Outstanding
Read 162
Write 125
Mixed 79
SusWrite 165
97% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 112%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 1GB
0GB free, PID 6528
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 5 5.1 5 5 5 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
4.32% Terrible
Read 12.2
Write 4.2
Mixed 5
SusWrite 5
8% 6.6 MB/s
4K Read 6.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
23% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.32%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$60
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 45.3
MC Write 39.3
MC Mixed 35.6
114% 40.1 GB/s
SC Read 25.2
SC Write 23.5
SC Mixed 32.9
78% 27.2 GB/s
Latency 72
56% 72 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 107%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 10,576 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) - $179

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,001
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback