Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-dk0xxx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 85FC
Memory	11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191122
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 04 '20 at 00:11
Run Duration	110 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9300H 116,682 User benchmarks, average bench 65% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	73.3% Very good	Memory 91.8 1-Core 126 2-Core 235 86% 151 Pts	4-Core 296 8-Core 582 52% 439 Pts	64-Core 580 36% 580 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 73.3% Great: 81%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SK hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG-8310A 512GB 6,904 User benchmarks, average bench 131% 421GB free (System drive) Firmware: 80002C00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 358 410 239 240 258 206 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 638 Write 594 Mixed 324 SusWrite 285 103% 460 MB/s	4K Read 19.8 4K Write 104 4K Mixed 36.3 132% 53.4 MB/s	DQ Read 291 DQ Write 531 DQ Mixed 278 248% 367 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 182%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GB 43,895 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	83.7% Excellent	MC Read 33.6 MC Write 31.8 MC Mixed 23.5 85% 29.6 GB/s	SC Read 18 SC Write 32 SC Mixed 27.3 74% 25.8 GB/s	Latency 64.5 62% 64.5 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 83.7% Great: 85%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	2,610x
GTX 1650 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 41%, 92,838 samples	1,508x
GeForce GTX 1050NvidiaBench 26%, 16,200 samples	497x

SSD
KIOXIA 256GBKbg30zmv256gBench 113%, 8,196 samples	425x
MZVLB256HAHQ-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 174%, 20,171 samples	414x
TOSHIBA 256GBKbg30zmv256gBench 99%, 31,797 samples	278x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 96,646 samples	717x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples	432x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 54,121 samples	399x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16