Asrock FM2A88X Pro3+

Performance Results


Gaming 25% Surfboard	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	38.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	89.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock FM2A88X Pro3+ (all builds)
Memory	6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160113
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 17 '17 at 15:18
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X4 860K-$51 29,887 User benchmarks, average bench 45% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	56.7% Above average	Memory 76.7 1-Core 68.9 2-Core 128 56% 91.3 Pts	4-Core 214 8-Core 215 29% 214 Pts	64-Core 214 13% 214 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 56.7% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% MSI(1462 3415) CLim: 1345 MHz, MLim: 2225 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.3.2 Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	38.4% Below average	Lighting 41.9 Reflection 70.5 Parallax 58.5 34% 57 fps	MRender 71.1 Gravity 42 Splatting 58.5 47% 57.2 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 38.4% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 150 480GB-$300 13,412 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 230GB free Firmware: SAFZ Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 4098 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 252 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 196 196 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 21 (C2) HDA temperature 64 53 201864708132 (F1) Unknown 100 100 27928	69.2% Good	Read 515 Write 335 Mixed 336 88% 396 MB/s	4K Read 28 4K Write 38.5 4K Mixed 9.78 75% 25.4 MB/s	DQ Read 190 DQ Write 112 DQ Mixed 46.4 62% 116 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 69.2% Great: 101%
OCZ ARC 100 240GB-$120 11,799 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 166GB free Firmware: 1.01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 0 0 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 8739 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 808 (AB) Unknown 100 100 83245904 (AE) Unknown 100 100 299 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (D0) Spin buzz 100 100 23 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 1 (E9) Unknown 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 1466 (F2) Unknown 100 100 2728 (F9) Unknown 100 100 73288422	79.2% Very good	Read 415 Write 416 Mixed 434 94% 421 MB/s	4K Read 24.9 4K Write 59.8 4K Mixed 22.1 98% 35.6 MB/s	DQ Read 213 DQ Write 140 DQ Mixed 72.8 82% 142 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 79.2% Great: 101%
Toshiba Q Series Pro 128GB-$66 2,808 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 76GB free (System drive) Firmware: JTRA Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 14430 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1128 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 100 (AD) Unknown 194 194 0 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 275 (C2) HDA temperature 59 53 201864380457 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	89.3% Excellent	Read 509 Write 450 Mixed 490 108% 483 MB/s	4K Read 23.9 4K Write 54.3 4K Mixed 34.5 109% 37.6 MB/s	DQ Read 186 DQ Write 135 DQ Mixed 81.2 82% 134 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 89.3% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT25664BA160B.C8F CT25664BA160B.C16F CT25664BA160B.C8F CT25664BA160B.C16F 8GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	41.5% Average	MC Read 18.4 MC Write 8 MC Mixed 18 42% 14.8 GB/s	SC Read 8.9 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 12.4 28% 9.87 GB/s	Latency 86.9 46% 86.9 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 41.5% Great: 39%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical FM2A88X Pro3+ Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A88X Pro3+

CPU
Athlon II X4 860KAMD $51Bench 45%, 29,887 samples	7x
A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $135Bench 45%, 19,875 samples	3x
A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 42%, 31,243 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	5x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples	2x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples	2x

SSD
CS900 240GBPNY $20Bench 73%, 61,417 samples	2x
AS350 512GBApacerBench 77%, 5,144 samples	2x
RevoDrive 3 PCIe 240GBOCZ $600Bench 70%, 224 samples	1x

RAM
RipjawsX DDR3 2133 C9 3x4GBG.SKILLBench 54%, 46 samples	3x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 51%, 4,160 samples	2x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBHyperX $35Bench 51%, 38,490 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $164

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16