HP Capirona

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP Capirona  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2A97
Memory2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100430
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 03 '20 at 15:15
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 260
Socket S1G2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
35.5% Below average
Memory 62.6
1-Core 23.2
2-Core 51.5
32% 45.8 Pts
4-Core 51.8
8-Core 50.5
7% 51.2 Pts
64-Core 52.5
3% 52.5 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 37%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 3200
HP(103C 2A97) 256MB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 8.970.100.1100
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
0.59% Terrible
Lighting 0.67
Reflection 1.27
Parallax 0.38
0% 0.77 fps
MRender 0.9
Gravity 0.27
Splatting 1.22
1% 0.8 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.59%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 250GB-$33
188GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP35
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 93 95 92 98 102 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 99.9
Write 103
Mixed 58.6
SusWrite 94.5
65% 89 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 68%
SanDisk Cruzer 4GB
3GB free, PID 5530
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 4.3 4.4 5.1 4.8 4.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
3.64% Terrible
Read 14.4
Write 1.7
Mixed 2.7
SusWrite 4.5
6% 5.83 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
9% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 3.64%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
22.4% Poor
MC Read 8.6
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 8.3
22% 7.67 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 6.4
16% 5.53 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 22.4%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Capirona Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: HP Capirona

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback