Asus P8H61 R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics8.57% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8H61 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120629
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 03 '20 at 13:23
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G2020-$92
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Memory 89.1
1-Core 82.4
2-Core 164
67% 112 Pts
4-Core 164
8-Core 158
22% 161 Pts
64-Core 163
10% 163 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8570
Dell(1028 2121) 1GB
CLim: 1015 MHz, MLim: 1170 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.7.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
8.57% Terrible
Lighting 10.6
Reflection 10.7
Parallax 13.3
9% 11.5 fps
MRender 9.52
Gravity 10.3
Splatting 11
8% 10.3 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.57%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD5000AVVS-63H0B1 500GB
178GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 56 57 63 61 60 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
30.4% Below average
Read 48
Write 62.8
Mixed 39
SusWrite 57.4
38% 51.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
125% 1 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 51%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB
131GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 27 27 26 26 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
20% Poor
Read 32.5
Write 19.5
Mixed 21.5
SusWrite 26.3
32% 25 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1
142% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 20%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99P5471-004.A01LF 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
30.5% Below average
MC Read 9.9
MC Write 9.8
MC Mixed 9
27% 9.57 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 9.7
SC Mixed 9.5
28% 9.63 GB/s
Latency 68.3
58% 68.3 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H61 R2.0 Builds (Compare 153 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61 R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback