Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics26.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive149% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory19.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190715
Uptime14.1 Days
Run DateAug 03 '20 at 08:39
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU 71%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$200
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Memory 87.9
1-Core 88.1
2-Core 181
70% 119 Pts
4-Core 302
8-Core 493
49% 397 Pts
64-Core 701
43% 701 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 451.67
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.9% Poor
Lighting 31.9
Reflection 65.7
Parallax 43.7
26% 47.1 fps
MRender 39.4
Gravity 32.8
Splatting 33.8
29% 35.4 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB (2018)-$59
188GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 101110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 530 427 428 435 436 433 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
149% Outstanding
Read 1,099
Write 1236
Mixed 1,042
SusWrite 448
215% 956 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 93.3
4K Mixed 39.1
140% 53.1 MB/s
DQ Read 789
DQ Write 755
DQ Mixed 759
574% 768 MB/s
Poor: 141%
This bench: 149%
Great: 228%
Crucial BX500 960GB-$54
338GB free
Firmware: M6CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5 5.5 5.2 5.6 3.8 5.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
23.4% Poor
Read 350
Write 5.5
Mixed 10
SusWrite 5.1
19% 92.7 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.3
34% 8.43 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 91%
Colorful SL500 320GB
295GB free
Firmware: Q0616B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 323 323 320 329 325 323 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMU16GX4M2C3000C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3001 MHz
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
71.5% Very good
MC Read 26.4
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 24.8
76% 26.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 15.7
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 69.6
57% 69.6 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,322 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $640
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback