Medion X87077

Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 25% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	22% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	114% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Medion X87077 (all builds)
Motherboard	MEDION MAG Z390M MORTAR (MS-7C00)
Memory	12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190822
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Aug 01 '20 at 22:31
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8500-$164 43,089 User benchmarks, average bench 82% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	91.6% Outstanding	Memory 89.3 1-Core 130 2-Core 257 88% 159 Pts	4-Core 506 8-Core 748 78% 627 Pts	64-Core 750 46% 750 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 91.6% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299 412,133 User benchmarks, average bench 94% Nvidia(10DE 119D) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.67 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	22% Poor	Lighting 24.9 Reflection 28.6 Parallax 23.3 20% 25.6 fps	MRender 35.5 Gravity 24.7 Splatting 32.3 25% 30.9 fps
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 22% Great: 101%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 140GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 465 359 399 371 434 420 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	114% Outstanding	Read 503 Write 480 Mixed 352 SusWrite 408 98% 436 MB/s	4K Read 41.4 4K Write 97 4K Mixed 55.2 185% 64.5 MB/s	DQ Read 278 DQ Write 246 DQ Mixed 261 196% 262 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 134%
WD Blue 2.5" 750GB (2010)-$55 30,952 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 285GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 58 56 57 55 56 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	32.4% Below average	Read 56.5 Write 55.7 Mixed 39.7 SusWrite 56.3 38% 52 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 111% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 32.4% Great: 54%
18701914 4GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 4GB free, PID 9917 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.4 3.7 7.6 8.7 8.7 5 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	4.96% Terrible	Read 14.9 Write 5.5 Mixed 7.7 SusWrite 6 10% 8.52 MB/s	4K Read 5 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 25% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.96% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905702-120.A00G 2x8GB 1,562 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2800 MHz Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	85.7% Excellent	MC Read 33.4 MC Write 35.1 MC Mixed 23 87% 30.5 GB/s	SC Read 18.4 SC Write 35.2 SC Mixed 25.3 75% 26.3 GB/s	Latency 68.1 59% 68.1 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 85.7% Great: 95%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X87077 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 120%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 109%

UFO

System: Medion X87077

CPU
Core i7-9700Intel $250Bench 92%, 79,875 samples	5x

GPU
RTX 2080S (Super)Nvidia $466Bench 131%, 261,508 samples	5x

SSD
SSD 1TBPcieBench 210%, 40,637 samples	3x
E12-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B16-BB1 1TBBench 210%, 324 samples	2x

RAM
CMK32GX4M2A2666C16 Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 029E CMK32GX4M2A2666C16 Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 48GBUnknownBench 69%, 5 samples	2x
M378A1K43CB2-CTD 4x8GBSamsungBench 88%, 1,851 samples	1x
M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 80%, 29,586 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $716

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16