Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics6.06% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive116% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus X99-A/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150930
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 01 '20 at 21:09
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 96.4
1-Core 141
2-Core 283
96% 174 Pts
4-Core 563
8-Core 886
89% 725 Pts
64-Core 1,105
68% 1,105 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 101%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8800 GTX
XFX(1682 2250) 768MB
Ram: 768MB, Driver: 341.74
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
6.06% Terrible
Lighting 7.87
Reflection 8.54
Parallax 3.28
6% 6.56 fps
MRender 7.62
Gravity 5.93
Splatting 6.35
5% 6.63 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.06%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
186GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 406 298 296 288 284 283 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 488
Mixed 386
SusWrite 309
95% 421 MB/s
4K Read 42.6
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 58.5
196% 69.6 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 355
267% 357 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 116%
Great: 124%
Corsair Force GT 120GB-$155
36GB free
Firmware: 5.03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 124 138 136 132 136 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Read 416
Write 148
Mixed 211
SusWrite 133
50% 227 MB/s
4K Read 34.4
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 41.6
160% 59.4 MB/s
DQ Read 190
DQ Write 154
DQ Mixed 134
111% 159 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 83%
Sabrent Rocket NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$30
220GB free
Firmware: ECFM12.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 995 510 302 300 303 303 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
178% Outstanding
Read 1,367
Write 940
Mixed 1,083
SusWrite 452
214% 961 MB/s
4K Read 48.4
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 58.1
214% 77.5 MB/s
DQ Read 706
DQ Write 659
DQ Mixed 714
527% 693 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 178%
Great: 223%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x4GB-$408
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
99.8% Outstanding
MC Read 39
MC Write 34.4
MC Mixed 38.8
107% 37.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 25.3
SC Mixed 21.6
59% 20.8 GB/s
Latency 52.7
76% 52.7 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-A/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 1,293 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $357
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback