HP Compaq 6730b (FY266UC#ABC)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 20%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (72%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq 6730b (FY266UC#ABC)  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 30DD
Memory1.2 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111207
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 01 '20 at 08:35
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 72%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo P8700-$42
Intel(R) Genuine processor, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
31.7% Below average
Memory 54.3
1-Core 23.1
2-Core 44.6
28% 40.7 Pts
4-Core 54.9
8-Core 60.6
8% 57.8 Pts
64-Core 59.7
4% 59.7 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Famille de jeu de puces Express Mobile Intel 45
HP(103C 30DD) 1.2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.1749
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
0.26% Terrible
Lighting 0.33
Reflection 0.31
Parallax 0.38
0% 0.34 fps
MRender 0.19
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 0.43
0% 0.28 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.26%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS723216L9A360 160GB-$69
97GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FC2OC60D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.7 8.7 14 9.8 11 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
6.03% Terrible
Read 11
Write 9
Mixed 9.5
SusWrite 10
7% 9.88 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.1
19% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 6.03%
Great: 44%
ST1000VM 002-1CT162 1TB
870GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 18 19 15 20 21 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
10.4% Very poor
Read 30
Write 23.8
Mixed 19.8
SusWrite 18.8
30% 23.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.3
33% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 15%
HP USB20 HS-COMBO 16GB
15GB free, PID 0423
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.7 5.9 5.1 5.5 6.6 6.3 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
5.22% Terrible
Read 13.4
Write 4.3
Mixed 7.8
SusWrite 5.8
9% 7.82 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
43% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.22%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
2048, 1024 MB
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
14.9% Very poor
MC Read 5.3
MC Write 5
MC Mixed 4.6
14% 4.97 GB/s
SC Read 3.6
SC Write 3.4
SC Mixed 3.2
10% 3.4 GB/s
Latency 146
28% 146 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback