PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 30% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 36.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus A78M-E (all builds) |
Memory | 10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20140606 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Aug 01 '20 at 04:21 |
Run Duration | 132 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 21% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD A10-6790K APU (2013 D.Ri)
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
|
39.5%
Below average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
30%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB
873GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UH4400RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 85 98 34 54 21 MB/s
|
36.9%
Below average
|
|||
WD Red 10TB (2017)-$419
931GB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 154 156 154 158 162 MB/s
|
86.6%
Excellent
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
|
30.8%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
A8-6600K APUAMD $88Bench 50%, 21,890 samples | 12x |
A4-7300 APUAMDBench 41%, 4,362 samples | 4x |
A8-5600K APUAMD $250Bench 49%, 14,744 samples | 3x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Radeon HD 8570DAMDBench 4%, 8,328 samples | 6x |
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples | 4x |
HD 7770AMDBench 12%, 38,053 samples | 3x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 68% - Good | Total price: $88 |