Asus Z9NA-D6

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics72.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory192GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 192GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAsus Z9NA-D6  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z9NA-D6
Memory187.2 GB free of 192 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150609
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 31 '20 at 22:51
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2470 0
Socket-B2 1356, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
69.2% Good
Memory 79.3
1-Core 81.4
2-Core 162
63% 108 Pts
4-Core 318
8-Core 594
54% 456 Pts
64-Core 1510
94% 1510 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$239
PNY(196E 1347) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.08
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
72.5% Very good
Lighting 89.4
Reflection 85.1
Parallax 79.8
73% 84.8 fps
MRender 118
Gravity 77
Splatting 75.3
72% 90 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 76%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adaptec Array 999GB
803GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 570 550 484 535 547 541 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 39% Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT84GL7AMR4C-R 6x31.8GB
6 of 6 slots used
191GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
63.6% Good
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 24.8
MC Mixed 24.6
71% 24.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 6.4
24% 8.33 GB/s
Latency 81.9
49% 81.9 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z9NA-D6 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus Z9NA-D6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback