Asus M3N78-EMH HDMI

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 36% Jet ski	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	45.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus M3N78-EMH HDMI (all builds)
Memory	2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20081104
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 31 '20 at 21:47
Run Duration	176 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom 9150e 947 User benchmarks, average bench 40% AM2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	39.8% Below average	Memory 62.8 1-Core 26.3 2-Core 53.1 33% 47.4 Pts	4-Core 99.9 8-Core 102 14% 101 Pts	64-Core 102 6% 102 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 39.8% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8200 1,005 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Asus(1043 82F2) 128MB Ram: 128MB, Driver: 342.01 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.48% Terrible	Lighting 0.5 Reflection 1.08 Parallax 0.09 0% 0.56 fps	MRender 1.19 Gravity 0.37 Splatting 0.78 1% 0.78 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.48% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53 237,241 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 284GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 54 66 56 53 69 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	45.3% Average	Read 220 Write 190 Mixed 203 SusWrite 59 38% 168 MB/s	4K Read 24.9 4K Write 36 4K Mixed 30.7 96% 30.5 MB/s	DQ Read 40.7 DQ Write 76.9 DQ Mixed 47.4 39% 55 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 45.3% Great: 125%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$65 108,153 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 234GB free Firmware: 12.01B02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 65 68 58 54 70 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	38% Below average	Read 69.1 Write 67 Mixed 50 SusWrite 62.7 46% 62.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 181% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 38% Great: 58%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 127 129 119 108 142 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	75.8% Very good	Read 140 Write 142 Mixed 72.4 SusWrite 124 88% 120 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 75.8% Great: 84%
WD WD2500JB-00REA0 250GB-$150 998 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 73GB free Firmware: 20.00K20 SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 42 43 43 43 44 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	24.5% Poor	Read 42.5 Write 41 Mixed 30.8 SusWrite 42.4 29% 39.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1 171% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 24.5% Great: 33%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	19.3% Very poor	MC Read 7.9 MC Write 4.7 MC Mixed 6.8 18% 6.47 GB/s	SC Read 5 SC Write 3.7 SC Mixed 5.5 14% 4.73 GB/s	Latency 120 33% 120 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 19.3% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M3N78-EMH HDMI Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 35%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M3N78-EMH HDMI

CPU
Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4400+AMD $50Bench 34%, 2,970 samples	3x
Phenom 9650AMD $125Bench 43%, 2,698 samples	2x
Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5600+AMDBench 39%, 3,286 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce 9400 GTNvidiaBench 1%, 12,718 samples	3x
Radeon HD 6770AMDBench 10%, 16,639 samples	1x
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples	1x

SSD
WDS250G2B0A-00SM50 250GBWDCBench 87%, 12,305 samples	1x
SSD370S 128GBTranscend $70Bench 74%, 10,510 samples	1x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	3x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	2x
4x1GBUnknownBench 18%, 54,972 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $50

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16