Gigabyte GA-Z97X-Gaming GT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics73.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive144% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z97X-Gaming GT  (all builds)
Memory7.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.4 GHz
Display3840 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150919
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateJul 31 '20 at 20:57
Run Duration225 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
79.8% Very good
Memory 88.3
1-Core 102
2-Core 204
76% 131 Pts
4-Core 384
8-Core 584
60% 484 Pts
64-Core 578
36% 578 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Nvidia(10DE 1F02) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3812 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.87
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
73.6% Very good
Lighting 87.1
Reflection 91.4
Parallax 98
71% 92.2 fps
MRender 140
Gravity 86.4
Splatting 73.7
79% 99.9 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$159
193GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 450 541 637 633 654 656 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
144% Outstanding
Read 681
Write 635
Mixed 529
SusWrite 595
137% 610 MB/s
4K Read 35.3
4K Write 79.9
4K Mixed 60.9
174% 58.7 MB/s
DQ Read 608
DQ Write 520
DQ Mixed 590
435% 573 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 144%
Great: 372%
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
87GB free
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 171 175 166 175 169 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
55.2% Above average
Read 378
Write 175
Mixed 191
SusWrite 172
51% 229 MB/s
4K Read 15
4K Write 45.3
4K Mixed 18.9
71% 26.4 MB/s
DQ Read 286
DQ Write 62.2
DQ Mixed 98.5
92% 149 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 76%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
169GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 114 115 116 115 116 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
63.9% Good
Read 109
Write 78.8
Mixed 68.8
SusWrite 114
68% 92.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
559GB free
Firmware: CC24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 155 156 155 157 159 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Read 158
Write 127
Mixed 77
SusWrite 150
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
133% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
35GB free
Firmware: NDP3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 138 145 142 146 144 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Read 167
Write 127
Mixed 78.7
SusWrite 139
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 112%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$176
53GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 68 68 71 79 79 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
43% Average
Read 78
Write 70.5
Mixed 63
SusWrite 71.6
52% 70.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
108% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 43%
Great: 63%
WD WD20EACS-11BHUB0 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 98 99 98 100 99 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
53.4% Above average
Read 87.7
Write 100
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 98.3
63% 85.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 66%
WD Elements 25A3 12TB
11TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 199 205 202 205 200 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
95.9% Outstanding
Read 202
Write 199
Mixed 148
SusWrite 202
254% 188 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 6.1
4K Mixed 1.3
314% 8.07 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 95.9%
Great: 100%
SanDisk SDDR-113 4GB
4GB free, PID a7c1
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.3 0.2 0.3 2.6 3 3.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
5.89% Terrible
Read 5
Write 4.2
Mixed 3.7
SusWrite 1.7
5% 3.65 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
78% 1 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.89%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMX8GX3M2A1333C9 1311 M2F8G64CB8HB5N-DI 0215 CMX8GX3M2A1333C9 1311 M2F8G64CB8HB5N-DI 24GB
1400, 1400, 1400, 1400 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
50.5% Above average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 15.5
50% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 14.6
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 69.2
58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z97X-Gaming GT Builds (Compare 178 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z97X-Gaming GT - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $959
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback