HP Laptop 15-da0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.82% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive181% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Laptop 15-da0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84A7
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181121
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 31 '20 at 11:08
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7020U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
49.5% Average
Memory 66
1-Core 62.6
2-Core 107
48% 78.4 Pts
4-Core 193
8-Core 191
26% 192 Pts
64-Core 196
12% 196 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia MX110
HP(103C 84A7) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5167
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
6.82% Terrible
Lighting 8.07
Reflection 8.54
Parallax 7.12
7% 7.91 fps
MRender 12
Gravity 7.87
Splatting 7.61
7% 9.14 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.82%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46
142GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1003 600 389 391 393 387 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
181% Outstanding
Read 1,297
Write 1,033
Mixed 1,044
SusWrite 527
218% 975 MB/s
4K Read 54.3
4K Write 81.1
4K Mixed 69.5
214% 68.3 MB/s
DQ Read 739
DQ Write 586
DQ Mixed 638
484% 654 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 181%
Great: 302%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
118GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,870
Write 3,361
Mixed 3,400
790% 3,544 MB/s
4K Read 158
4K Write 93.2
4K Mixed 95.6
411% 116 MB/s
DQ Read 758
DQ Write 666
DQ Mixed 726
540% 716 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2133 C15 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
64.6% Good
MC Read 22.6
MC Write 27.7
MC Mixed 21.7
69% 24 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 20.6
SC Mixed 17.6
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Laptop 15-da0xxx Builds (Compare 4,871 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 15-da0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback