Asus M5A97 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics0.61% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive76.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory17.4 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150626
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 16 '17 at 02:31
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
58.5% Above average
Memory 77.3
1-Core 72.1
2-Core 133
57% 94.1 Pts
4-Core 220
8-Core 291
32% 256 Pts
64-Core 292
18% 292 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 3450
Dell(1028 0342) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
0.61% Terrible
Lighting 0.63
Reflection 1.85
Parallax 0.47
0% 0.98 fps
MRender 1.1
Gravity 0.17
Splatting 1.43
1% 0.9 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.61%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ssd2sc12 0G1SA754D117-551 120GB
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: N111 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Read 505
Write 303
Mixed 361
86% 390 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 62.9
4K Mixed 24.6
102% 37.3 MB/s
DQ Read 160
DQ Write 152
DQ Mixed 65.1
74% 126 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
1TB free
Firmware: SC47 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 56% Great: 113%
WD WD5000AVDS-63U7B1 500GB
466GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
52.9% Above average
Read 98.1
Write 86.2
Mixed 89.4
69% 91.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 0.93
4K Mixed 0.27
69% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 52%
SAMSUNG HE253GJ 250GB
233GB free, PID 2351
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
21.9% Poor
Read 30.4
Write 30.9
Mixed 29.7
39% 30.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3.47
4K Mixed 0.56
139% 1.54 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 20GB
1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36.6% Below average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 11.7
MC Mixed 12.2
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 10.3
26% 9.2 GB/s
Latency 85.7
47% 85.7 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 36%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,841 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 R2.0 - $89

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $354
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback