User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 46% Yacht	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	6.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Hewlett-Packard
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 2B17
Memory	19.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170308
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 30 '20 at 08:39
Run Duration	210 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-670K (2013 D.Ri) 403 User benchmarks, average bench 53% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	47.6% Average	Memory 58.7 1-Core 67.5 2-Core 120 48% 81.9 Pts	4-Core 212 8-Core 210 28% 211 Pts	64-Core 212 13% 212 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 47.6% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 240 58,337 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Device(1B0A 90D3) 2GB CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.4.2 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	6.8% Terrible	Lighting 8.37 Reflection 8.54 Parallax 10.6 7% 9.16 fps	MRender 8 Gravity 7.93 Splatting 8.7 7% 8.21 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.8% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$79 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 323GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 881 453 295 317 303 301 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 119 119 120 120 119 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	67.8% Good	Read 117 Write 118 Mixed 88.7 SusWrite 119 82% 111 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 0.8 179% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 67.8% Great: 83%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$31 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 752GB free Firmware: 80.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 167 170 172 171 171 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	96.1% Outstanding	Read 165 Write 164 Mixed 110 SusWrite 169 112% 152 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 1.1 236% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 96.1% Great: 109%
WD Elements 2TB 35,768 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1.5TB free, PID 10b8 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 88 90 92 91 89 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	36.6% Below average	Read 81.5 Write 82.5 Mixed 50.2 SusWrite 89.3 103% 75.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 36.6% Great: 44%
WD Elements 25A1 4TB 8,402 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 2.5TB free, PID 25a1 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 100 98 100 99 98 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	61.7% Good	Read 118 Write 97.2 Mixed 65 SusWrite 98.7 124% 94.8 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 7.4 4K Mixed 0.8 283% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 61.7% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 Kingston 99U5471-066.A00LF Kingston 99U5584-005.A00LF 24GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 8192, 8192, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	29.5% Poor	MC Read 14.7 MC Write 6 MC Mixed 10.6 30% 10.4 GB/s	SC Read 7.4 SC Write 6.5 SC Mixed 9.6 22% 7.83 GB/s	Latency 131 30% 131 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 29.5% Great: 30%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16