Gigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics58.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte H110M-H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF  (all builds)
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores, , 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161116
Uptime5.5 Days
Run DateJul 30 '20 at 03:14
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User PAN-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7100-$38
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
68.9% Good
Memory 80.3
1-Core 123
2-Core 230
81% 145 Pts
4-Core 337
8-Core 312
44% 325 Pts
64-Core 337
21% 337 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.7.2
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Lighting 73.7
Reflection 72.1
Parallax 97.4
60% 81.1 fps
MRender 74
Gravity 74
Splatting 57.6
55% 68.5 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SUV500M8960G 960GB
774GB free
Firmware: 003056RI
SusWrite @10s intervals: 368 318 144 145 216 130 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Read 414
Write 376
Mixed 295
SusWrite 220
73% 326 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 81.4
4K Mixed 40.4
139% 50.3 MB/s
DQ Read 299
DQ Write 257
DQ Mixed 175
159% 244 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 94%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26
295GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 78 85 72 77 86 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Read 182
Write 182
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 80.2
87% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.5
124% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$70
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 174 174 175 175 176 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
99% Outstanding
Read 171
Write 139
Mixed 76.3
SusWrite 174
102% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 99%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMV4GX4M1A2133C15 04CB 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
64.6% Good
MC Read 24.4
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 19.8
65% 22.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 24.3
SC Mixed 19.6
58% 20.1 GB/s
Latency 79.9
50% 79.9 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H110M-H-CF Builds (Compare 3,497 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $98
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback