Fujitsu CELSIUS W380

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 49% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	9.89% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	34.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS W380 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D2917-A1
Memory	6.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100818
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 15 '17 at 16:55
Run Duration	98 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 550-$110 19,058 User benchmarks, average bench 47% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	44.3% Average	Memory 53.7 1-Core 74.2 2-Core 118 48% 82.1 Pts	4-Core 202 8-Core 202 27% 202 Pts	64-Core 204 13% 204 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 44.3% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250 54,392 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Asus(1043 838C) 1GB CLim: 910 MHz, MLim: 1026 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 378.66 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	9.89% Terrible	Lighting 11.1 Reflection 13.1 Parallax 9.41 9% 11.2 fps	MRender 15.5 Gravity 11.5 Splatting 15.1 12% 14 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 9.89% Great: 9%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160 11,403 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 40GB free (System drive) Firmware: 603ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 39351483 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 -22488448759299 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 511 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 138 (B1) Unknown 0 0 1 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 33 39 73016999969 (C2) HDA temperature 33 39 73016999969 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 39351483 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 39351483 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 39351483 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 4294967296 (E9) Unknown 0 0 4792 (EA) Unknown 0 0 3816 (F1) Unknown 0 0 3816 (F2) Unknown 0 0 3193 (F4) Unknown 99 99 4128821	34.9% Below average	Read 250 Write 109 Mixed 125 35% 162 MB/s	4K Read 13.5 4K Write 39.9 4K Mixed 9.69 54% 21.1 MB/s	DQ Read 16.6 DQ Write 87.9 DQ Mixed 2.46 16% 35.6 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 34.9% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown M378B2873EH1-CH9 80CE M378B2873EH1-CH9 859B CT51264BD160B.C16F 80AD HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 8GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 1024, 1024, 4096, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	22.9% Poor	MC Read 8 MC Write 7.9 MC Mixed 8.4 23% 8.1 GB/s	SC Read 5.8 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 6 16% 5.6 GB/s	Latency 147 27% 147 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 22.9% Great: 26%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CELSIUS W380 Builds (Compare 48 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS W380

CPU
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	24x
Core i5 660IntelBench 49%, 5,902 samples	7x
Xeon X3450IntelBench 66%, 3,425 samples	6x

GPU
RX 550AMD $79Bench 14%, 79,894 samples	4x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	3x
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	3x

SSD
Vi550 S3 256GBVerbatimBench 67%, 433 samples	4x
MZ7LN256HCHP-000L7 256GBSamsungBench 81%, 7,649 samples	3x
Raid 0 Volume 480GBIntelBench 105%, 11,256 samples	2x

RAM
9905471-009.A00LF 4x4GBUnknownBench 40%, 21 samples	4x
HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 46%, 5,138 samples	3x
HMT351U6EFR8C-PB 4x4GBHynixBench 57%, 2,366 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $149

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16