Fujitsu CELSIUS H770

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics20.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive125% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS H770  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNB2AD
Memory25.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190517
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 29 '20 at 09:59
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6
Onboard, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
74.7% Very good
Memory 80.6
1-Core 109
2-Core 203
74% 131 Pts
4-Core 371
8-Core 568
58% 470 Pts
64-Core 582
36% 582 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M2200
Fujitsu(10CF 196B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1038 MHz, MLim: 1377 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 442.92
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
20.2% Poor
Lighting 25.6
Reflection 32.7
Parallax 29.4
21% 29.2 fps
MRender 28.5
Gravity 25.5
Splatting 18.1
19% 24 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme THNSF5512GPU7 TO 512GB
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 57FA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 384 238 221 218 195 194 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
125% Outstanding
Read 947
Write 246
Mixed 869
SusWrite 242
128% 576 MB/s
4K Read 40.2
4K Write 72.1
4K Mixed 49.7
163% 54 MB/s
DQ Read 824
DQ Write 161
DQ Mixed 397
316% 460 MB/s
Poor: 90%
This bench: 125%
Great: 211%
Jmicron Generic 500GB
159GB free
Firmware: 0405
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 36 36 37 37 37 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
21% Poor
Read 35.5
Write 34.7
Mixed 31.5
SusWrite 36
26% 34.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1.1
239% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 21%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18ASF2G72HZ-2G3B1 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
77.3% Very good
MC Read 28
MC Write 30.2
MC Mixed 25
79% 27.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 30.6
SC Mixed 22.4
66% 23.1 GB/s
Latency 79.4
50% 79.4 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CELSIUS H770 Builds (Compare 66 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS H770

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback