Gateway NE722

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 5%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 5.72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemGateway NE722  (all builds)
MotherboardGateway EG70_KB
Memory1.2 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20130422
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateJul 28 '20 at 14:24
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E1-2500 APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
5.72% Terrible
Memory 6.42
1-Core 9.2
2-Core 15.8
6% 10.5 Pts
4-Core 29.9
8-Core 24.9
4% 27.4 Pts
64-Core 22.8
1% 22.8 Pts
Poor: 7%
This bench: 5.72%
Great: 30%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 8240
Acer(1025 0782) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.251.9001.1001
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
0.59% Terrible
Lighting 0.03
Reflection 3.19
Parallax 1.78
0% 1.67 fps
MRender 2.14
Gravity 1.33
Splatting 2.52
2% 2 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.59%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD050 500GB-$23
336GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AX003J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 39 41 42 32 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
17.1% Very poor
Read 21.7
Write 36.2
Mixed 17.3
SusWrite 38
21% 28.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
60% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G6E1 Kingston ACR16D3LS1NGG/2G 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
9.21% Terrible
MC Read 3.6
MC Write 3.1
MC Mixed 4.3
10% 3.67 GB/s
SC Read 0.2
SC Write 0.9
SC Mixed 0.6
2% 0.57 GB/s
Latency 438
9% 438 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.21%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NE722 Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Gateway NE722

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback