Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	10% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U 78,189 User benchmarks, average bench 48% FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	67.3% Good	Memory 70.4 1-Core 109 2-Core 172 68% 117 Pts	4-Core 353 8-Core 462 52% 407 Pts	64-Core 478 30% 478 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 67.3% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics 115,953 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Legend(17AA 3801) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.2.1 Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	10% Very poor	Lighting 11.6 Reflection 12.9 Parallax 16 10% 13.5 fps	MRender 11.1 Gravity 12.7 Splatting 15.8 11% 13.2 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 10% Great: 13%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZHPV512HDGL-000H1 512GB 35 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 109GB free (System drive) Firmware: BXW24H0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 1013 1190 1249 1048 812 1141 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 48% Great: 102%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA851S6CJR6N-VK Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 12GB 134 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2667, 2667 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	68.3% Good	MC Read 25.3 MC Write 23.4 MC Mixed 22.8 68% 23.8 GB/s	SC Read 20.3 SC Write 30.8 SC Mixed 22.2 70% 24.4 GB/s	Latency 100 40% 100 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 68.3% Great: 69%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 54%

Yacht

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

GPU
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	106x
Radeon RX Vega 10 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 37,264 samples	13x
Radeon Vega 3 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 27,821 samples	8x

SSD
SKHynix_HFS256GD9TNG-L3A0B 256GBBench 125%, 4,440 samples	45x
MZVLB256HAHQ-000L2 256GBSamsungBench 180%, 5,016 samples	29x
PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1101 256GBWDCBench 162%, 186 samples	11x

RAM
4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 Hynix HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 12GBMicronBench 49%, 486 samples	15x
4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 12GBMicronBench 49%, 683 samples	14x
4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 8GBMicronBench 59%, 5,397 samples	10x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16