Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	32.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E6550-$20 11,349 User benchmarks, average bench 37% CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.35 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	40.5% Average	Memory 72.5 1-Core 26.7 2-Core 53.1 36% 50.8 Pts	4-Core 53.7 8-Core 51.8 7% 52.8 Pts	64-Core 53.2 3% 53.2 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 40.5% Great: 43%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
V300 60G 60GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 33GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0424A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 141 41 33 25 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	32.7% Below average	Read 257 Write 195 Mixed 217 SusWrite 81.7 42% 188 MB/s	4K Read 23.8 4K Write 24.4 4K Mixed 0.8 50% 16.3 MB/s	DQ Read 48.7 DQ Write 133 DQ Mixed 1.1 27% 61.1 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 32.7% Great: 44%
USB DISK 3.0 16GB 1,966 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 7GB free, PID 5500 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.8 10 10 11 8.4 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	8.2% Terrible	Read 32.9 Write 7.8 Mixed 1.8 SusWrite 9.9 13% 13.1 MB/s	4K Read 5.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 20% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.2% Great: 34%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	19.5% Very poor	MC Read 6.7 MC Write 5.7 MC Mixed 5.6 17% 6 GB/s	SC Read 5.5 SC Write 5.9 SC Mixed 6.2 17% 5.87 GB/s	Latency 95.6 42% 95.6 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 19.5% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,143x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,049x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	826x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	457x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	427x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16