Gigabyte GA-B450 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive45.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B450 AORUS ELITE  (all builds)
Memory9.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190722
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 27 '20 at 15:06
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$185
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Memory 82.8
1-Core 118
2-Core 215
79% 139 Pts
4-Core 421
8-Core 782
72% 602 Pts
64-Core 1,148
71% 1,148 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
TSA 240GB 240GB
120GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1024A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 25 43 29 24 43 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
45.2% Average
Read 462
Write 54.6
Mixed 53.3
SusWrite 33.7
32% 151 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 41.6
4K Mixed 6.4
72% 25.1 MB/s
DQ Read 158
DQ Write 52.5
DQ Mixed 39
46% 83.2 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 96%
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116
197GB free
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 333 334 331 329 329 329 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Read 442
Write 333
Mixed 278
SusWrite 331
78% 346 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 76.9
4K Mixed 37.4
130% 47.3 MB/s
DQ Read 177
DQ Write 287
DQ Mixed 160
142% 208 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2666C15D4/4G HMA451U6AFR8N-TF KHX2666C15D4/4G 12GB
2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
78.1% Very good
MC Read 30.5
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 23.1
78% 27.2 GB/s
SC Read 23.2
SC Write 32.6
SC Mixed 24.5
76% 26.8 GB/s
Latency 75.6
53% 75.6 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B450 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 11,152 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B450 AORUS ELITE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $441
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback