Asus M5A97 LE R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	41.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	47.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus M5A97 LE R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	28.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160324
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 27 '20 at 06:13
Run Duration	228 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	15%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T-$240 23,506 User benchmarks, average bench 57% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	58% Above average	Memory 77.1 1-Core 53.2 2-Core 107 50% 79 Pts	4-Core 212 8-Core 317 33% 264 Pts	64-Core 316 20% 316 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 58% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Gigabyte(1458 371A) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 451.48 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	41.3% Average	Lighting 55.9 Reflection 50.2 Parallax 63.8 46% 56.6 fps	MRender 72 Gravity 67.2 Splatting 0.09 33% 46.4 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 41.3% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42 87,912 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 23GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z22000RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 12 9.8 6.8 12 5.5 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	47.4% Average	Read 418 Write 156 Mixed 156 SusWrite 11.3 40% 185 MB/s	4K Read 21.6 4K Write 56.7 4K Mixed 12.6 79% 30.3 MB/s	DQ Read 159 DQ Write 159 DQ Mixed 77.5 81% 132 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 47.4% Great: 78%
SSD 360GB 360GB 1,295 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 59GB free Firmware: S0423B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 286 18 50 29 33 28 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	59.1% Above average	Read 451 Write 313 Mixed 258 SusWrite 74.1 61% 274 MB/s	4K Read 20 4K Write 74.9 4K Mixed 21.5 98% 38.8 MB/s	DQ Read 99.4 DQ Write 225 DQ Mixed 0.4 46% 108 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 59.1% Great: 84%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$65 108,153 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 40GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 64 64 65 65 64 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	39.1% Below average	Read 71.5 Write 68.7 Mixed 58 SusWrite 64.4 49% 65.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.5 114% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 39.1% Great: 58%
WD WD800ABJS-23TEA0 80GB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 20GB free Firmware: 01.00A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 39 39 40 40 38 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	23.8% Poor	Read 43.2 Write 43.5 Mixed 36.4 SusWrite 39.3 30% 40.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 156% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 23.8% Great: 30%
Innostor Innostor 32GB 101 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 4GB free, PID 0903 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 28 28 29 28 28 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	11% Very poor	Read 28.2 Write 26.5 Mixed 15.8 SusWrite 28.3 33% 24.7 MB/s	4K Read 3.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 1.1 49% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 11% Great: 38%
SSD 120G B 120GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 21GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 22 23 23 23 23 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	69.6% Good	Read 38.2 Write 37.1 Mixed 37.6 SusWrite 23 46% 34 MB/s	4K Read 9.2 4K Write 18.5 4K Mixed 9.9 1,000% 12.5 MB/s	DQ Read 11.5 DQ Write 18.9 DQ Mixed 10.8 1,053% 13.7 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 69.6% Great: 73%
Mass Storage Device 500GB 5,742 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 93GB free, PID 6116 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 22 22 22 22 22 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	15.2% Very poor	Read 37.6 Write 30.6 Mixed 31.1 SusWrite 21.5 40% 30.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 80% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 15.2% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown KHX1866C10D3/8G Kingston 99P5471-033.A00LF KHX1866C10D3/8G Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G 32GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	31.8% Below average	MC Read 14.4 MC Write 6.5 MC Mixed 12.3 32% 11.1 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 6.2 SC Mixed 7.8 20% 7.07 GB/s	Latency 86.1 46% 86.1 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 31.8% Great: 33%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A97 LE R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,460 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 LE R2.0 - $200

CPU
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	428x
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	389x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	203x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	108x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	67x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	66x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	51x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	36x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	32x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	46x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	32x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBHyperX $35Bench 51%, 38,490 samples	26x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $377

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16