Performance Results


Gaming 36% Jet ski	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	61.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	39.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA (all builds)
Memory	7.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161107
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 27 '20 at 04:56
Run Duration	194 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-6300-$90 261,607 User benchmarks, average bench 55% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	55.5% Above average	Memory 72.4 1-Core 72 2-Core 126 55% 90.1 Pts	4-Core 214 8-Core 279 31% 246 Pts	64-Core 284 18% 284 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 55.5% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% XFX(1682 C580) CLim: 1470 MHz, MLim: 2175 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.7.2 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	61.1% Good	Lighting 76.4 Reflection 74.9 Parallax 106 62% 85.7 fps	MRender 76.6 Gravity 80.7 Splatting 62.3 59% 73.2 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 61.1% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Mushkin ECO2 120GB-$70 304 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 65GB free (System drive) Firmware: 609ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 75 91 88 101 105 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	39.9% Below average	Read 217 Write 53.1 Mixed 174 SusWrite 92.1 30% 134 MB/s	4K Read 24 4K Write 22.8 4K Mixed 19.7 74% 22.2 MB/s	DQ Read 83.3 DQ Write 50.1 DQ Mixed 77.7 55% 70.4 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 39.9% Great: 75%
Samsung 750 EVO 120GB-$35 20,420 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 112GB free Firmware: MAT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 304 134 123 130 127 128 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	67.4% Good	Read 487 Write 363 Mixed 316 SusWrite 158 74% 331 MB/s	4K Read 35.4 4K Write 27.6 4K Mixed 28.3 104% 30.4 MB/s	DQ Read 243 DQ Write 38.2 DQ Mixed 83.9 76% 122 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 67.4% Great: 110%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 27GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 302 276 296 237 60 60 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	71.1% Very good	Read 486 Write 395 Mixed 374 SusWrite 205 82% 365 MB/s	4K Read 37.1 4K Write 25.6 4K Mixed 28 106% 30.2 MB/s	DQ Read 274 DQ Write 34.3 DQ Mixed 76.1 75% 128 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 71.1% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1600EL Series F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 1600EL Series F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 12GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz 2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	36.7% Below average	MC Read 13.9 MC Write 12.7 MC Mixed 12.1 37% 12.9 GB/s	SC Read 8.5 SC Write 8 SC Mixed 11.7 27% 9.4 GB/s	Latency 96 42% 96 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 36.7% Great: 37%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	51x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GBKingstonBench 63%, 12,722 samples	13x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	13x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $588

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16