Asrock X399 Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 109%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 115%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics114% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive117% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X399 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory26.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191204
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 26 '20 at 15:40
Run Duration416 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 2920X
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
Memory 90
1-Core 129
2-Core 254
88% 158 Pts
4-Core 507
8-Core 797
80% 652 Pts
64-Core 1,935
120% 1,935 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
MSI(1462 373E) ≥ 4GB; GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER™ GAMING X
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 446.14
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
114% Outstanding
Lighting 151
Reflection 140
Parallax 150
123% 147 fps
MRender 173
Gravity 121
Splatting 102
105% 132 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 114%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 1TB
827GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT23B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 456 467 472 473 474 474 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 417
Mixed 441
SusWrite 469
103% 458 MB/s
4K Read 41.5
4K Write 84.2
4K Mixed 54.5
177% 60.1 MB/s
DQ Read 294
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 297
222% 293 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 117%
Great: 133%
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
476GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2218 2219 2218 2216 2217 2218 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
365% Outstanding
Read 2,615
Write 2,217
Mixed 1,550
SusWrite 2,218
483% 2,150 MB/s
4K Read 57
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 77.7
265% 95 MB/s
DQ Read 1,044
DQ Write 897
DQ Mixed 1,004
743% 982 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 365%
Great: 393%
PNY CS3030 1TB SSD
95GB free
Firmware: CS303226
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1474
Write 2,540
Mixed 1,600
422% 1,871 MB/s
4K Read 44.6
4K Write 155
4K Mixed 74.5
245% 91.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1098
DQ Write 944
DQ Mixed 1,070
789% 1,038 MB/s
Poor: 157% Great: 286%
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB
867GB free
Firmware: UH5100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 344 275 272 278 280 274 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
61.2% Good
Read 456
Write 399
Mixed 318
SusWrite 287
82% 365 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 42.7
4K Mixed 15.4
69% 25.2 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 95.5
DQ Mixed 29.5
43% 80.6 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 58%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90
463GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 458 466 468 469 469 469 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 479
Mixed 411
SusWrite 466
104% 464 MB/s
4K Read 42.4
4K Write 94.6
4K Mixed 56.7
187% 64.6 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 351
DQ Mixed 360
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 123%
Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90
445GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 459 467 468 469 469 469 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 493
Write 484
Mixed 411
SusWrite 467
104% 463 MB/s
4K Read 42.6
4K Write 95.1
4K Mixed 57
188% 64.9 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 355
DQ Mixed 363
274% 366 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 123%
Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90
248GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 458 466 468 468 469 470 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 479
Mixed 412
SusWrite 467
104% 464 MB/s
4K Read 42.2
4K Write 92.4
4K Mixed 56.1
185% 63.6 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 350
DQ Mixed 359
270% 361 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 122%
Great: 134%
Samsung 750 EVO 500GB
439GB free
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 484 370 328 328 328 328 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 473
Mixed 367
SusWrite 361
95% 424 MB/s
4K Read 41.1
4K Write 95.3
4K Mixed 55
183% 63.8 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 350
DQ Mixed 346
264% 357 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 115%
Great: 123%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90
464GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 482 480 480 480 480 479 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 481
Mixed 410
SusWrite 480
106% 468 MB/s
4K Read 42.6
4K Write 95.5
4K Mixed 56.8
188% 65 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 354
DQ Mixed 362
273% 365 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 124%
Great: 134%
Seagate ST2000LM007-1R8174 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: SBK2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 126 126 126 126 126 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
65.7% Good
Read 104
Write 124
Mixed 59
SusWrite 125
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
212% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 67%
Seagate ST4000LM016-1N2170 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 110 114 112 112 112 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Read 89.3
Write 103
Mixed 72.5
SusWrite 100
67% 91.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 0.4
207% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3200 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 39.1
MC Write 36.6
MC Mixed 34.2
105% 36.6 GB/s
SC Read 27.7
SC Write 42.2
SC Mixed 31.9
97% 33.9 GB/s
Latency 67.3
60% 67.3 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 103%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X399 Taichi Builds (Compare 561 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X399 Taichi

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $921
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback